<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc SYSTEM "rfc2629.dtd">
<rfc category="info" ipr="noModificationTrust200811" docName="draft-wood-term-modest-proposal-annotations-00">
<?rfc toc="yes"?>
<?rfc strict="yes"?>
<?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
<?rfc compact="yes"?>
<?rfc subcompact="no"?>
<?rfc tocdepth="2"?>
<?rfc symrefs="yes"?>
<?rfc comments="yes" ?>
<!--<?rfc rfcedstyle="yes"?>-->
<?rfc sortrefs="yes" ?>

  <front>
    <title abbrev="Annotations on A Modest Proposal">Annotations on A Modest Proposal for
    Acceptable Terminology with Git</title>

        <author initials="L." surname="Wood" fullname="Lloyd Wood">
          <organization abbrev="Oceania"></organization>
          <address>
            <postal>
             <street></street>
             <city>Sydney</city><region>New South Wales</region>
             <country>Australia</country>
            </postal>
            <email>lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk</email>
          </address>
        </author>


        <date/>

	<keyword>terminology</keyword>
	<keyword>IETF</keyword>
	<keyword>1984</keyword>
	<keyword>Orwell</keyword>

  <abstract>

<t>
  This document provides annotations on "A Modest Proposal for Acceptable Terminology
  with Git", particularly noting relevant quotes from, and references to, the works and life of
  George Orwell.
</t>
  </abstract>

  </front>
  <middle>

  <section anchor="intro" title="Introduction to Annotations and to A Modest Proposal">
<t>
  Notes on "A Modest Proposal for Acceptable Terminology with Git" <xref target="MODEST" />
  are given here. Quotes from original texts are given in approximately the same positions
  as the text alluding to them in that document. Quotes without a source, particularly those
  citing Part and Chapter, are from George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel" ("1984")
  <xref target="NOV" />.
</t>
<t>
  <xref target="MODEST" /> is published on the first of April, April Fools' Day, a traditional
  time for the IETF to issue jests to reassure itself that it still possesses something akin
  to a sense of humour. Using the title _A Modest Proposal_  to warn of impending satire is a
  longstanding tradition that began with the title of Jonathan Swift's cookery recipes
  <xref target="SWIFT" />.
</t>
<t>
  The very interested reader can consult many useful Wikipedia pages.
</t>
 <t>
   The Umbrella Corporation is the ultimate cause of all events in the Resident Evil
   franchise. Not to be confused with the Umbrella Academy, the ultimate cause of all
   events in that other franchise.
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="discouraged" title="Discouraged Terminology">
<t>
  To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion.
</t>
  </section>
  <section anchor="constrain" title="Constraining Use of Undesirable Terminology">
<t>
  'git' is an insult in British variants of English, not used in polite language. That it
  is now the name of a software tool used for maintaining the Linux kernel is perhaps
  unsurprising, given Linus Torvalds' creation of git as a result of displeasure with the
  actions of Andrew Tridgell <xref target="GIT" />. The choice of name may suggest that
  git was never intended for widespread use, or for marketing broadly in git-based cloud
  services such as GitHub.
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="replace" title="Replacing Use of Unwanted Terminology">
<t>
  George Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four" is concerned with controlling human behaviour
  and with revising and rewriting the past, and with changing language to achieve
  those ends. And with committees.
</t>
<t>
  P3S6 _He had won the victory over himself._ -- the penultimate sentence.
  Victory Mansions. Victory Square. Victory Gin. Victory coffee. Victory cigarettes.
  Victory is entirely on-brand. Winning!
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="beyond" title="Beyond Legacy Terminology">
<t>
  "Thought leadership" is not an Orwellian term.      
</t>
<t>
  Aldous Huxley wrote "Brave New World". He also taught Eric Blair French at Eton.
  Blair went on to teach in Hayes and in Uxbridge. Later, Huxley wrote to Blair on
  which of the fictions of "Brave New World" or "Nineteen Eighty-Four" he thought
  was more dystopian and as likely to come to pass -- his own <xref target="HUX" />.
</t>
<t>
  Eton has also moulded twenty British prime ministers, including the current
  incumbent of the office. Those twenty men all went on to create and rule their
  own actual real dystopias, showing, as ever, that those who can't do, teach.
</t>
<t>
  P3C2 _But I tell you, Winston, that reality is not external.
  Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else._ -- O'Brien.
</t>
<t>
  _One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can at least change one’s own habits,
  and from time to time one can even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out
  and useless phrase -- some jackboot, Achilles’ heel, hotbed, melting pot, acid test,
  veritable inferno or other lump of verbal refuse -- into the dustbin where it belongs._
  <xref target="ENG" />
</t>
<t>
  _ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS_ Chapter X
  <xref target="FARM" />.
</t>
<t>
  _After much thought Snowball declared that the Seven Commandments could in effect
  be reduced to a single maxim, namely: "Four legs good, two legs bad."_ Chapter III
  <xref target="FARM" />.
</t>
<t>
  _Dying metaphors [..] there is a huge dump of worn-out metaphors which have lost all
  evocative power and are merely used because they save people the trouble of inventing
  phrases for themselves._ <xref target="ENG" />.
</t>
<t>
  _TCP implementations should follow a general principle of robustness: be
  conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from others._
  Postel's Principle is now over forty years old, and ready for an update in reworked
  language appropriate for modern society.
</t>
<t>
  _Don't think of an elephant_ <xref target="THINK" />. Good cognitive linguistics.
</t>
<t>
  S1C5 _'What I had really intended to say was that in your article I noticed you
  had used two words which have become obsolete. But they have only become
  so very recently. Have you seen the tenth edition of the Newspeak
  Dictionary?'_ -- O'Brien.
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _The voice came from an oblong metal plaque like a dulled mirror which formed
  part of the surface of the right-hand wall. Winston turned a switch and the voice
  sank somewhat, though the words were still distinguishable. The instrument
  (the telescreen, it was called) could be dimmed, but there was no way of
  shutting it off completely._ Today, we are must attend and appear engaged in
  video conference calls. Your camera is off? What are you hiding?
</t>
<t>
  P2C3 _'She was -- do you know the Newspeak word GOODTHINKFUL? Meaning naturally
  orthodox, incapable of thinking a bad thought?'_ -- Winston Smith.
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="support" title="Supporting the IETF">
<t>
  P1C2 _Down in the street the wind flapped the torn poster to and fro, and the
  word INGSOC fitfully appeared and vanished. Ingsoc. The sacred principles
  of Ingsoc._
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU_ As are Facebook, Google...
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="picture" title="A Picture of the Future">
<t>
  P3C3 _'If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face
  -- for ever.'_ -- O'Brien.
</t>
<t>
  _Thus, for example, UNCOLD meant 'warm', while PLUSCOLD and DOUBLEPLUSCOLD
  meant, respectively, 'very cold' and 'superlatively cold'._
  Appendix, The Principles of Newspeak.
</t>
<t>
  P1C4 _times 3.12.83 reporting bb dayorder doubleplusungood refs unpersons rewrite
  fullwise upsub antefiling_ 
</t>
<t>
  "++ungood;" is a pun on doubleplusungood for programmers, coined in 2002 by
  Lloyd Wood and produced as a well-received T-shirt by Dave Green of the Need To Know
  newsletter. That shirt has been sported by computing luminaries, including Guido
  van Rossum and Aaron Swartz, and has appeared at IETF meetings <xref target="SHIRT" />.
  Francis Spufford read the shirt, and coined the simpler _Plus Plus Ungood_
  -- a new phrase for a newer Newspeak. The rise of emoji was not anticipated.
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed -- would
  still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper -- the essential crime
  that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was
  not a thing that could be concealed for ever. You might dodge successfully for a
  while, even for years, but sooner or later they were bound to get you._ Rather like
  celebrity journalists, really.
</t>
<t>
  P2C5 _During the Two Minutes Hate she always excelled all others in shouting
  insults at Goldstein. Yet she had only the dimmest idea of who Goldstein
  was and what doctrines he was supposed to represent._
</t>
<t>
  P1C4 _When one knew that any document was due for destruction, or
  even when one saw a scrap of waste paper lying about, it was an automatic
  action to lift the flap of the nearest memory hole and drop it in_
</t>
<t>
  _embrace, extend and extinguish_ -- Wikipedia summarizes Microsoft's corporate
  strategy on standards and their convictions.
</t>
<t>
  P1C3 _The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had been actually
  destroyed._
</t>
<t>
  P1C5 _'It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.'_ -- Syme.
</t>
<t>
  P3C2 _'We do not merely destroy our enemies, we change them. Do you understand
  what I mean by that?'_ -- O'Brien.
</t>
<t>
  P1C4 _The messages he had received referred to articles or news items which
  for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, as the
  official phrase had it, to rectify._
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH_
</t>
<t>
  P3C4 _If you want to keep a secret, you must also hide it from yourself._
</t>
<t>
  "Your Garden Made Perfect" (BBC Two) is a television programme that uses
  virtual reality for its ideal purpose of reimagining back yards.
</t>
<t>
  P1C8 _Statues, inscriptions, memorial stones, the names of streets -- anything
  that might throw light upon the past had been systematically altered._
</t>
<t>
  P2C5 _'Already we know almost literally nothing about the Revolution and the years
  before the Revolution. Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has
  been rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street and
  building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And that process is
  continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists
  except an endless present in which the Party is always right.'_ -- Winston Smith.
</t>
<t>
  P3C3 _'Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again
  in new shapes of your own choosing.'_ -- O'Brien.
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _[Newspeak was the official language of Oceania. For an account of its
  structure and etymology see Appendix.]_ Now that computing debates such as 'emacs
  or vi' and 'tabs or spaces' have been resolved, correcting the language used
  should be straightforward.
</t>
<t>
  P1C5 _'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of
  thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible,
  because there will be no words in which to express it.'_ -- Syme.
</t>
<t>
  P3C2 _'It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the
  Party.'_ -- O'Brien.
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="sec-con" title="Security Considerations">
<t>
  P1C3 _'Who controls the past,' ran the Party slogan, 'controls the future: who
  controls the present controls the past.' And yet the past, though of its
  nature alterable, never had been altered._
</t>
<t>
  P1C1 _ FREEDOM IS SLAVERY_
</t>
<t>
  Did Orwell actually shoot and kill an elephant? <xref target="BURMA" />
</t>
<t>
  Why a code revision tracking system designed to meet the specific needs of developing
  and reviewing changes to the Linux kernel was ever considered appropriate for
  shared editing text or standards lies outside the scope of this document
  <xref target="RFC8874" />. The IETF does not have a strong history of inventing
  or of funding development of its own fit-for-purpose documentation tools, but
  does co-opt and repurpose popular tools from elsewhere. Value has been extracted
  from roff.
</t>
<t>
  Wikipedia's pages are controlled and edited by the most persistent Wikipedians,
  who are usually male, and so reflect male bias <xref target="BACK" />. It is
  fair to say that history is written by Victor -- not Victoria.
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="iana-con" title="IANA Considerations">
 <t>
   P3C2 _'Do you remember,' he went on, 'writing in your diary, "Freedom is the
   freedom to say that two plus two make four"?'_ -- O'Brien.
 </t>
 <t>
   http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/ re-renders acute and grave accents as
   their base ASCII characters, and disallows wholly numerical reference targets
   such as "[1984]", while internet-drafts are now being written that describe
   correct Unicode emoji use -- without being able to use emoji, which is a mixed
   blessing. Moving to UTF-8 is one careful step <xref target="RFC7997" />.
   Tools evolve the language that they convey. Choose your tools well.
 </t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="rfc-con" title="RFC Editor Considerations">
<t>
  P1C1 _It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen._
  -- the opening sentence.
</t>
<t>
  There is an RFC Series Editor (RSE) function, but there has been no fully appointed
  RFC Editor since 2019 <xref target="RFC" />. There is arguably less autonomy to counteract
  competing interests. Concern about imbalance in power structures is warranted.
  Given its past <xref target="RFC8700" />, what is the future of the Series? The RFC Editor
  would, one might think, be the final authority on language used in RFCs... but that is
  outside the immediate scope of this document. Do we need another Postel?
</t>
  </section>

  <section anchor="ack" title="Acknowledgements and Address">
<t>
  P1C5 _'Or again, if you want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there
  in having a whole string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid"
  and all the rest of them? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or "doubleplusgood"
  if you want something stronger still.'_ -- Syme.
</t>
<t>
  Orwell learned Spanish, among many other languages, and fought in the Spanish Civil
  War. Earlier, he had lived with, and been unimpressed by, Esperanto speakers.
  We could all do with a little more polish.
</t>
<t>
  George Orwell was the pen-name, suggested in a letter to his literary agent,
  of the man born and buried as Eric Arthur Blair. Blair was not a loud speaker, even
  before being shot in the throat during trench warfare.
  His voice was deemed "unattractive", but that did not prevent a statue from being
  erected in his honour <xref target="BBC" />.
</t>
<t>
  Without the protection of copyright, we will see more Orwell <xref target="COPY" />.
</t>
<t>
  Re-education camps do not come from Orwell; the world that he describes _is_
  a re-education camp.
</t>
<t>
  P3C5  _'The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world.'_ --
  O'Brien. This was inspired by a basement room of the British Broadcasting
  Corporation (BBC) where Orwell had worked <xref target="BBC" />.
</t>
<t>
  Oceania is one of three superstates competing to rule the world.
</t>
<t>
  Editing these annotations did not require any git-derived mechanism.
</t>
  </section>
 
  </middle>
  <back>
    
    <references title="Normative References">

      <!--
	  <?rfc include="reference.I-D.wood-term-modest-proposal" ?>
      -->
      <reference anchor="MODEST">
       <front>
         <title>A Modest Proposal for Acceptable Terminology with Git</title>
	 <author initials="L." surname="Wood"/>
        <date month="April" year="2021"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="draft-wood-term-modest-proposal-00" value="(work in progress)" />
      </reference>
      
      <reference anchor="NOV">
       <front>
         <title>Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Novel</title>
	 <author initials="G." surname="Orwell"/>
        <date month="June" year="1949"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Secker" value="&amp; Warburg"  />
      </reference>
      
    </references>
    
    <references title="Informative References">
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7997" ?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8700" ?>
      <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8874" ?>

      <reference anchor="HUX">
       <front>
         <title>Aldous Huxley to George Orwell: My Hellish Vision of the Future
	 is Better Than Yours (1949)</title>
	 <author initials="A." surname="Huxley"/>
        <date month="October" year="1949"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Open Culture," value="reprinted August 2018" />
      </reference>
      
      <reference anchor="BURMA">
       <front>
         <title>Shooting an Elephant</title>
	 <author initials="G." surname="Orwell"/>
        <date month="" year="1936"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="New" value="Writing" />
      </reference><!-- alluded to briefly in Burmese Days -->
      
      <reference anchor="ENG">
       <front>
         <title>Politics and the English Language</title>
	 <author initials="G." surname="Orwell"/>
        <date month="April" year="1946"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Horizon, vol. 13 issue 76," value="pp. 252-265" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="FARM">
       <front>
         <title>Animal Farm</title>
	 <author initials="G." surname="Orwell"/>
        <date month="August" year="1945"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Secker" value="&amp; Warburg" />
      </reference>
      
      <reference anchor="GIT">
       <front>
         <title>A Git Origin Story</title>
	 <author initials="Z." surname="Brown"/>
        <date month="July" year="2018"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Linux Journal"
		   value="&lt;https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/git-origin-story&gt;" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="THINK">
       <front>
         <title>Don't Think of An Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate</title>
	 <author initials="G." surname="Lakoff" />
         <date month="" year="1990" />
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="Chelsea Green" value="Publishing Co." />
      </reference>
      <!-- http://www.dancingbadger.com/glelephant.htm
      summary review at https://berkeleysciencereview.com/2012/12/think-of-an-elephant-a-completely-ridiculous-non-sensical-elephant-who-will-stomp-you-out-if-you-do-not-stop-it/ -->

      <reference anchor="BBC">
       <front>
         <title>Why George Orwell is returning to the BBC</title>
	 <author initials="V." surname="Dowd"/>
        <date month="November" year="2017"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="BBC News"
       value="&lt;https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-41886208&gt;" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="SHIRT">
       <front>
         <title>++ungood; T-shirts - in stock now</title>
	 <author initials="L." surname="Wood"/>
        <date month="April" year="2007"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="softwear"
       value="&lt;https://www.employees.org/%7Elwood/ungood/&gt;" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="SWIFT">
       <front>
         <title>A Modest Proposal For preventing the Children of Poor People From being a
	 Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and For making them Beneficial to the Publick</title>
	 <author initials="J." surname="Swift"/>
        <date month="April" year="1729"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="S. Harding,"
       value="London" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="COPY">
       <front>
         <title>George Orwell is out of copyright. What happens now?</title>
	 <author initials="D. J." surname="Taylor"/>
        <date month="January" year="2021"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="The Guardian books blog,"
       value="London &lt;https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2021/jan/01/george-orwell-is-out-of-copyright-what-happens-now&gt;" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="RFC">
       <front>
         <title>RFC Series Editor</title>
	 <author initials="by" surname="committee"/>
        <date month="March" year="2021"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="webpage"
       value="&lt;https://www.rfc-editor.org/rse/&gt;" />
      </reference>

      <reference anchor="BACK">
       <front>
         <title>Women are Writing Themselves Back Into History on Wikipedia</title>
	 <author initials="M." surname="McDonough"/>
        <date month="March" year="2021"/>
       </front>
       <seriesInfo name="NBCLX"
       value="&lt;https://www.lx.com/social-justice/women-are-writing-themselves-back-into-history-on-wikipedia/34029/&gt;" />
      </reference>
      
      
    </references>
   
  </back>
</rfc>
